Colombia, August 4, 2009.
Under what happened at the Estadio Centenario in the city of Armenia on August 1 this year, where there are clashes between police and supporters of Atletico Nacional, developed a sequence positions, findings and information provided by regulatory agencies for Football as spectacle and the media.
One of these is Resolution No. 004 of 2009 which states and what the answer is:
1.The there continue to be acts of violence in Colombian professional soccer tournament that necessitate the imposition of emergency measures for dealing with these situations.
"Emergency measures?, When for over a year and came bringing concrete ideas about the eradication of the bars and the collaboration of the Dimayor in social projects where they recognize that they are not responsible for any social background who live them.
2.What instances have been exhausted laws, regulations and dialogue with the different bars of the participating teams in the Colombian Professional Football Tournament, without success.
Depletion?, Only in January enacted a law which makes a number of functions of a committee where they just know each of the top brass of the date of meeting, where not been invited to a single member of the bars "organized" in the country, "Sold the club, the checkpoints, the work of the police Sunday in a stadium, the violations of Human Rights as they move from barristas city \u200b\u200bto another, the operations, resources to promote peace in the stadiums, the freedom of mobility, freedom of expression, etc.., etc., etc.?
Dialogue?, Where?, When? ... ah! Perhaps the times they were invited to the conference to a forum and talked and went, or in that meeting in Medellin in October last year which said they were very timed and could not sit down with calm ... if others were those times.
"Positive?, ah! Those social projects through our own efforts we are making, those where we referred to certain institutions and organizations and their argument is that they believe it is possible to work with "hooligans and misfits."
3.What is imperative to promote and restore peace in stages to ensure the safety, comfort and conviviality in the organization and practice of this sporting spectacle.
the same "peace" that is fostered by the riot police when they destroy our buses on the road with amendments as - for being such a team you can not come to our city, are rubbish and no room for you - or when we're hit by the row for the requisition, where sometimes with the same gloves checked bags, rags, people want to look inside of our mouths, but can be when coming out of a game we expected, causing the crash, capturing no reason pregnant women and taking them inside the armored car, beaten and then asking for forgiveness because they did not know she was pregnant, or it can be when shares of the police and other institutions leave us on the road in places where no get at least water and stay in those places is for 4 hours or more, and many other violations which we "must" be silent because you are the institutional ...
Show, function or public entertainment held in place where people gather to witness ... PUBLIC! which means not to privatize what you consider "football show" how they think so, or perhaps the movement ban and bar entry to non-sale ticket office is not privatizing the show?, when as indicated by the Act 1270 of 2009 and its components, individualization is the emblem, and now as censorship applies to all the bars, when it is assumed that censorship is for those who commit the offense.
4.What for addressing the problem of violence at football grounds requires the concerted response of the football authorities and the State related to the safeguarding of public order and security.
safeguard public order ... Does that same disorder is prompted by the police, and do security always provide them on the road when it is they who also attack us? ... to you it seems that you were speaking the same language, we do NOT!.
now sticking to their arguments, resolve:
Section 1. From the date until further notice is PROHIBITED from entering the stadium, who bear anything alluding to the visiting team (T-shirts, flags, hats, etc.).
Stages are public arenas, in Colomi there is only one club that has a category A owned a sports arena to carry out the spectacle of football, therefore it is NOT possible to prohibit the entry into the stands when these scenarios are public goods, where as the same Dimayor consider the properties offered to perform the SHOW, the same age is listed as well.
is incredible for a ban on entry to the cities of groups of bars, when not only prohibits us from ourselves, but to any citizen who carries a piece of equipment that the city is on the road, when we are in a country must "prevail" equality under the same territory.
Article 2. In the same vein, local clubs prohibits direct sales and parcel of any nomination ballots visiting club or bar.
clubs do prohibit the sale of ticket office visitors, if there are clubs where sometimes benefit more from the visitor's locker that local, that is damage for the same club, ie if the ticket office prohibited is any nomination, means any platform, so the game will be for locals, which we insist for some clubs is not beneficial. And again, censorship and prohibition of a right costitucional.
In Questioning the approach of that article, since "any nomination visiting club or bar, remember to never give stitch without thimble ... ITS BARS, will also take them as the same local club?.
Article 3 - Local clubs are responsible for compliance with the restrictive measures stipulated above.
The responsibility given to clubs who think they meet a law that affects their economy or continue with the support of the club using the box office again questionable .. . What is he thinking managers?.
Article 4 º - are encouraged local security officials and the National Police for taking steps to restrict the movement of the bars of visiting teams.
"" pray "?, The Constitution states, Article 24 Right to Free Movement in the Colombian territory, then, are we going to ban?, Apart from that we censor the entry to stadiums in their view, either now or move around, because we think would happen if we will mobilize ...¿¿?? ESMAD happy again "restricting" and doing their job.
Section 5 - Likewise, it reiterates the National Police all support from the Dimayor for taking action which foster the effectiveness of these provisions and all those that are aimed at ending violence in the stadiums of the country within the regulatory terms of FIFA, the Colombian Football Federation and Dimayor.
Dimayor total support to use repressive measures that are necessary, because as she ever heard one of those characters ... "We are only interested us take care of the private good, the public does not concern us, but if the football public that we are witnessing and pay as much money as they please ... and worse clubs where the owners are two or three characters, as if required by Act 1270 of 2009 that bars are governed under democratic standards, the clubs do not give a single step to the same democratization.
Section 6 - In accordance with the bylaws of the entity we are calling for Special Meeting of Class A affiliate clubs for Thursday, August 13, 2009 to ratify or modify the emergency measures adopted by this resolution.
participation request en espacios como estos, porque de nuevo, vuelve y juega, Articulo 79. La ley garantizará la participación de la comunidad en las desiciones que puedan afectarlo. Y ésto nos AFECTA, nos cercena nuestros derechos, somos concientes de los hechos anteriormente acontecidos, pero insistimos para qué es la comisión si cuando tiene que entrar a decidir no lo hace, pero si lo hacen otros. Nos preguntamos...¿hubo participación en la desición participó el Ministerio de Educación, el Ministerio de Cultura, Coldeportes, Director de la Policia Nacional, la Federación Colombiana de Futbol?, cuando se suponen que son quienes conforman la comisión.
INCOSTITUCIONAL LO, this resolution Desecrate:
Article 13: All are free and equal regardless of the political and philosophical opinion.
Article 16: Right to free development of personality.
Article 20: Right to freedom of expression.
Article 24: Right to free movement within Colombia.
Article 38: Right to free association.
Article 40: Right to Citizen Participation.
Article 79: The law shall guarantee the participation of the community in decisions that may affect it.
And a right to which we are not seeing any warranty, Article 12: No one shall be subjected to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, to which we add as "anecdotes"
ESMAD beaten in the rows that are used to pre-register before entering the game.
ESMAD creating for injuries that leave evidence for life, such as pregnant women abuse, abduction of women and men who are taken to the armored car left first then hit anywhere blows leave permanent injuries, among many other things according to the Declaration of Human Rights are inhuman.
Incitement to violence by the police and riot police, when we walk around and call us "black, white, mop, joints, etc" without other phrases profanity and inspire us to respond to their actions.
damage the inside wall to those who live Football and we're not talking to players, but to the people living thing that moves in after a game, because well .. very well prohibit . and where is the interest for the other ... only their coffers? ..
And here again we stand and vehemently express our condemnation of the various forms of violent action and expression that are generated in football occasionally and on a daily basis in the country in the fields, cities, streets and neighborhoods.
also want to convert the stadiums and territories of peace through football and contribute to the solution of the problems that young people within football bars, and the problems of the country, we believe we can become key actors in the development of alternatives to promote a culture of football and life as well as it has been conducted in cities such as Medellin and Bogota among many others.
is time to act as a collective and propose actions to the determination that arbitrarily were taken, to which proposals have come as no admission to a local date, proposing only the use of fronts and rags, but no mass. Things how are you and are only decisions of each of the bars apply leadership or not, what is needed is that if you can not sing the same, or display the nonconformity in the same way, but we can not remain silent, that decisions that concern us we were only to be informed and implemented.
Partners must act, we can not let this happen, we can not allow ourselves to curtail the passion we live, act.
All suggestions, internal positions and Stripes reported please send mails to barrismosocialcolombiano@gmail.com, rompeolasbarrismo@hotmail.com, Action - Reaction Partners! RESOLUTION NO GIVEN BY DIMAYOR!.
Barrista COLOMBIAN JOINT
0 comments:
Post a Comment